Open Process Hierarchy by Prospero2013

The concept of the Heavy Conductor
can be summed up as:
the Heavy Conductor node
precedes any and all subconductor-roles.
A simple logic leads us to this concept.
The Heavy Conductor has to be disposed
at the apex of the process pyramid
and all information flows downward
from this unique location.

Does the expression ‘Heavy Conductor’ imply that
this conductor is primarily a ‘knower’?
Does this role necessarily need a heavyness?
The Heavy Knower concept
did the most to make the Pure process
a central part of Heavy Process doctrine.
Within this scheme,
open process was impossible and irredeemable.

Open process, as a theory, had been around
for a few generations.
Open process gained popularity in 1972
when F. , one of the scientists who discovered
the Process Blueprint
inspected the nature of ‘hierarchy.’
He used a complex computer model
to show how an open process could function
(developing what is now known as the open process hierarchy).

Several decades later
I came to the conclusion
that translation and the Open process go together.
A complex open process spreads
through a series of translations.
Translations are creative acts
that don’t come from the local subconductor.
There’s a third party involved,
an emergent Conductor
invisible within it.

The translator is in a sense ungenerative.
It merely acts as a node in a complex process
that is beyond its power to control.
But as the mother of the Conductor
is not just the vessel
so the translator is not just an empty conduit
through which the original passes.

Does the expression ‘open conductor’ imply
that the entire process is the ‘knower’?
Does this open process necessarily need a lightness
in order to function?
The Open Conductor would have to be disposed
at the every point of the complex open process,
everywhere and nowhere,
real and unreal,
the end and the beginning
the Cause and the Effect
the Knower and the Known
all at once.