1/11/17: WTC Seismic Evidence with Richard Gage, AIA, and Graeme MacQueen by 9/11 Free Fall published on 2018-01-11T21:27:53Z Host Andy Steele is joined by Richard Gage, AIA, and Dr. Graeme MacQueen to discuss the often-overlooked seismic data indicating that powerful explosions took place prior to the plane strikes and prior to any debris hitting the ground during the earthshaking destruction of the WTC towers. Genre Science Comment by mike beijingyank @user-996532026: Until dead or in prison nobody is safe. We are dealing with democide monsters who think the murder of 500,000 babies is "worth it." 2018-01-14T21:07:22Z Comment by Barry Mead @user-996532026: Surely a part of analysis here that boosts the evidence is to find planned building demolitions and secure the seismic records of any within similar distances. All-If more than one-that are available. Do the same with building collapses and partial collapses,there may be records available now that are just recorded from a specific date. If for example we can show a tendency for a degree of seismic activity to be shown in a demolition and various other collapses not deliberate,that stacks up in black and white, what would be expected. By actively recording on video and timing at both locations (A seismic monitoring station at x km away and at the scene of the demolition) then it becomes clear of the rate of travel (not perfect since density of the earth will affect the speed of the activity being recorded) But all together this is a massive evidence that shows an impartial panel of jurors for example, what SHOULD happen,what DOES happen. 2018-01-14T11:43:33Z Comment by architect @user-996532026: This entire topic has been brilliantly dealt with by Judy Wood, a forensic scientist and materials specialist, who it seems to me, since it was her job for years, to be one of the best qualified people to write on 9/11. I read her book, much of which deals specifically with this seismic issue. As she (in my opinion) correctly pointed out, the signal came as the tower was "falling" because it was not "falling" at all. It was pulverising, or dustificating as she puts it, and the seismic signal was caused by the ground compensating for a building that "was disappearing". In this context it makes sense. It seems to me very suspicious that the truth movement ignores the brilliant findings and conclusions of this excellent and highly qualified scientist. WHAT are you people so scared of? that the truth comes out by any chance? 2018-01-13T23:27:51Z Comment by Robrage We can't let the Globalist psychopaths get away with mass murder. They profited from insider info on Wall St. The Bush war using 9-11 as justification...They are the enemy within. 2018-01-12T20:52:16Z
