Project 5 Teacher's.epub by Thimacpephy1971

Project 5 Teacher's.epub

Project 5 Teacher's.epub ===> https://picfs.com/2sBijH

In addition, it is important with any Terminology Consensus Project, to allow space for the development of additional definitions that may emerge in this domain. This may be particularly relevant where there are new sub-domains of research arising or new areas for research. This was addressed in project by using the SBRN Terminology Working Group’s agreed-upon list of terms and meanings as the starting point for the consensus process (see the Terminology Consensus Project Charter). However, these terms were not specifically selected to address new and emerging areas, but rather, where the currently held definitions and understanding of the literature were deemed to be the least optimal. To address this, the inclusion of additional terms (in particular those from the SBRN Terminology Working Group) were suggested for inclusion in the consensus process. Four such additional terms were proposed by the Terminology Working Group themselves. The areas discussed during the consensus meetings suggest that this is a necessary feature of any Terminology Consensus Project, to address the apparent shortcoming of this Terminology Working Group’s final consensus definitions and their proposed criteria of inclusion. While we did not solicit additional terms and meanings, the established inclusion/exclusion criteria is the best place to start for the development of additional terms. Another added benefit of this approach is that the use of the SBRN Terminology and Modifiers Working Group (TMWG) suggested definitions of these additional terms not always agreed on by the Terminology Working Group has allowed us to better understand the scope and impact of each term in the assessment of sedentary behavior research and theory.
This systematic process of consensus is not without its critics. A number of terms that are now widely used in sedentary behavior research (e.g.,'sedentary behavior', ‘physical activity’, ‘inactivity’, ‘sedentary behaviour’) were not included in the initial brainstorming meetings or the strategy to design the survey and invite SBRN members to participate (see the Terminology Consensus Project Charter). Such terms are useful and can be included in future Terminology Consensus Projects. However, it is unclear if this area would need a full Terminology Consensus Project, a part of a Terminology Consensus Project, or if an alternate approach would be more effective. a3f8a02ae1