Episode 77: Frugality Fables and the Poor-Shaming Grift of Financial Advice Journalism by Citations Needed Podcast published on 2019-05-29T15:18:37Z “How this millennial saved $1 million by age 30,” The Washington Post writes. “A Millennial Saved $100,000 With This Simple Habit,” CNBC insists. “How to save for retirement when you're living paycheck to paycheck,” CNN confides in us. Everywhere in American media we are told, if only we engaged in simple, no nonsense discipline we can retire at 35. But what is the political objective of this popular mode of journalism? More than just generating clicks to sell investment instruments to the credulous, this genre has a distinct ideological purpose: to obscure generational poverty, largely brought on by the legacy of racism and Jim Crow, and make being poor the result of a series of moral failings rather than a deliberate political regime decided on by powerful actors. This week, we explore the “personal finance” media industry and the corollary, so-called FIRE movement—and how their poor shaming, libertarian ethos has increasingly seeped into our mainstream click-happy online press. Our guest is writer and editor Miles Howard. Comment by Trisha Smith "Deserving" poor 2019-10-19T12:57:33Z Comment by ayyy ayyy implying Chinese land reform was bad, landlords should all be fucking shot 2019-09-06T20:55:40Z Comment by No Telefrag Plz @brandon-noyes-1: arguing like it's facebook. you have to be a troll because there's no way you think these are points with any punch. 2019-08-19T22:18:43Z Comment by No Telefrag Plz Imagine that, landlords posturing themselves as financial masterminds and the true backbone of the working class because they're completely disconnected from human struggles 2019-08-19T21:45:47Z Comment by Brandon Noyes look up china land reform, read about that. make sure to check both sides of the argument before making an opinion. free shit sounds good but nothing is realling free people 2019-08-19T13:29:30Z Comment by Brandon Noyes you guys are the ultimate cucks 2019-08-19T13:21:38Z Comment by Brandon Noyes wealth redistribution or other ways? that is so radical. "The millennials make up most of the working class" so what if they do? You work twords bettering yourself. u can't just start taking peoples shit because they're richer than you 2019-08-19T13:21:16Z Comment by Robin Wright Nate salary is publicly available on his employers (ActBlue) irs 990 form. In 2016 he made almost $250,000. 2019-07-27T22:56:54Z Comment by user403270928 @james-fairbrother-785146734: It was a shitty joke at the cost of disabled people, correct. But at the same time we can't ignore the anti-capitalist framework of the podcast and this episode in particular. Disabled people are in such dire situation, because of capital and the market. That they have to rely on unintentionally useful products is bad. It reminds me of the liberal discourse around charity. 2019-07-25T14:44:42Z Comment by TaylorAtOnce @citizen-sb: Makes sense. Liberalism is a pro-capitalist ideology. 2019-07-22T18:52:39Z Comment by Dylan Villain @user-48754494: Read Capital. Liberals have been spinning this bullshit for 200 years, and Marx dedicated a lot of pages to debunking on it. 2019-07-21T19:00:16Z Comment by Four-Three-Five Recorder In other words, it's "bootstraps bullshit." 2019-06-17T19:56:14Z Comment by Ganymede station Great episode 2019-06-06T15:07:20Z Comment by Culturenaut 100K? That's like 6 times my income. 2019-06-01T09:16:11Z Comment by Parkimedes I think the target audience is rich people. And the message is, you can stop working, if you live like you're middle class. 2019-05-31T21:28:18Z Comment by Michael Jacob Weisman Great episode but your guest's screeching sibilance made this impossible to listen to through headphones. 2019-05-30T20:58:21Z Comment by Kai Azor Another great episode 2019-05-30T12:44:58Z Comment by Citizen SB All the people I know who are FIRE'd or trying to become FIRE'd are liberals. 2019-05-30T04:07:21Z Comment by James Fairbrother Pre-cut products are really a godsend for disabled people, just because you don't see the point in them doesn't mean they don't have a purpose or a market for someone. Shitting on "lazy" products that are useful for the disabled is a bad look, Annie Elainey goes over this well in a video of hers, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHeiITqKTA8 2019-05-29T20:27:21Z