With love of democracy - democracy Op Anonymous
We are not cattle or viewer or recipient or end user or consumer choice.
We are human beings - and our influence is beyond your access.
Can handle it.
Online company. Yes this networked society begins to organize faster than the parties themselves, which they have traditionally ruled. Using the www, the company will be better informed, smarter, and more demanding with regard to the missing character traits that most parties.
The society calls.
The society consists of people, not demographic sectors.
Conversations between people sound human. They are conducted in a human voice.
Whether it is to share information or opinions to represent viewpoints, to argue or to spread stories - the human voice is typically open, natural and unpretentious.
People recognize the sound of his voice.
The Internet allows conversations between people who were in the age of mass media impossible.
Hyperlinks subvert hierarchy.
Both in the inter-networked society and in intranetworked parties (Pirates) people talk to each other on a powerful new way
These networked conversations allow that powerful new forms of social organization and exchange of knowledge unfold. Anonymous is one of the examples.
As a result of this development, the company is smarter, better informed and better organized. Participation in the network society changes people fundamentally.
People in the network society have found that they receive from one another much better information and more support than. By Members and traditional media (no shit Sherlock) So much for the political rhetoric about the value of their work
There are no more secrets. The networked society knows about the work of the parties more than the parties themselves Whether the news is good or bad, it is passed (or we leak teh shit out of ya)
What happens to the company is also happening between the participants of the parties. But a metaphysical construct is between the company and the participants of the parties.
Parties do not speak with the same voice as these new networked conversations. In the ears of those addressed by the parties them sound hollow, flat, literally inhuman.
Already sounding the homogenized "voice" of the policy - the sound of mission statements and manifestos - so artificial and placed, like the language of the French court in the 18th century
Already reach parties who speak with the voice of Barker, anybody.
Anyone who assumes the online society is the same company that had once endured the TV commercials on TV makes of something.
Parties that do not realize that the company is now networked person-to-person, so getting smarter and will be missed in a permanent conversation, their main chance.
Parties may, for the first time to communicate directly with the company. If they fail in these talks, this could be their last chance.
The parties should realize that society is full of laughter - the parties themselves
The parties need to be more relaxed and take themselves less seriously. What they need is a sense of humor.
Develop a sense of humor does not mean send some jokes like Wulff, Heveling or even run into Eisel. Rather, it is about real values, modesty, clear language and a really own position.
Parties who want to "position" should, to take a position. Ideally, this position will have something to do with what interests the society, such as direct participation in order to prepare a stop to the lobby.
Bombastic announcements, e.g. "We want to be the best for society at XYZ" is not a position for a long time, let alone a position.
The parties need to get down from their ivory towers and talk with the people with whom they hope to create relationships.
Public relations is not related to the public. The parties are deeply anxious before the companies.
With its distant and arrogant language they build walls to keep the company at bay.
Most party programs are based on the fear that society would recognize what is really happening in politics.
To distrust can be constructed but no relationships.
Party loyalty is the political version of a relationship. But the separation is coming - and soon. In the networked society relations are terminated with breathtaking speed and re-negotiated.
The networked society can change their representatives on the fly. We'll enziehen legitimacy over lunch with a mouse click. That you do not have your legitimation vertretet teaches us to think critically. "A representative of the people does not represent What's the point?"
The Intelligent Company will find ways to represent their interests themselves.
To speak with a human voice is not a carnival trick. They can not just pick up on a posh conference.
To speak with a human voice, the parties need to address the concerns and fears of the society - sharing - the community of citizens.
For this they must first of all belong to a company and not an elite class who does not share the same problems.
The parties should ask themselves how far their culture. In particular, the culture admit their own mistakes and correct. Guttenberg and Wulff is the way, but this is not an error culture.
If their culture ends where the community begins, they will have no more voters.
Human communities emerge from discourses - from human conversations about human concerns.
The community of discourse is the society.
Parties that do not belong to a discursive community are extinct.
The parties have made a religion of their safety. But that's just a red herring. Most of the parties to protect us from terrorism less than represent themselves before the people they should.
Just as the network society, the participants speak directly to each other and within the parties - and not just about rules, laws and election results.
Such meetings are now held in the internal circuits of the parties. But only when the conditions are right.
Sites are usually installed top-down in order to enforce the party philosophy and other party information. The participants usually give their best to ignore this information.
The Internet has circumnavigate usually tend boredom. Blogs are v0on citizens launched together who wanted to create something of value - the networked expression and exchange of information.
A healthy Internet contributors organized in many ways. Its effects are more radical than any manifesto.
Although it scares the parties almost to death, they are directly dependent on an open Internet, where vital knowledge is created and distributed. The parties must resist the impulse to "improve" these networked conversations or control.
If the Internet is not forced into a cage of fear and rules, it unfolds in a conversation of the networked society.
Rigid hierarchies that worked in earlier times in which strategies and plans yet fully understood by the party leadership were and therefore could be handed down from the top.
Today the Orgchat of hyperlinks, not hierarchies. The value of practical knowledge supersedes the importance of abstract authority.
Command structures arising from bureaucracy and strengthen them even more. The result is a paranoid political culture.
Paranoia kills any conversation. That is their purpose. But lack of open conversation kills parties.
Two meetings will take place at the same time. In a party. The other with the company.
In most cases, neither conversation runs optimally. Almost always, the cause can be found for it in outdated command structures.
Than party politics, these structures act as poison. Instruments as they are ineffective. Command structures, the Company met with hostility and mistrust.
Both talks seek discourse with each other. They speak the same language. They recognize each other's voice.
Wise the parties will not stand in his way, and thereby contribute to the fact that the inevitable happens faster.
If the willingness to go out of the way an indicator of IQ, then, few parties have gained in mind.
Millions of people who are surfing the internet today, the parties shall only be true as flimsy constructs that provide the networking of these two discourses active in the way.
That is suicidal. The Company would like to speak with the parties.
Unfortunately is just part of a party that wants to talk to the society, hidden behind a veil of verbiage, the language sounds wrong - and often is.
The company does not want to talk with phrases threshers. To participate in conversations that are taking place behind the firewalls of the parties.
Join us and the veil and talk about ourselves: We are the society. We want to speak with you.
We want access to your party information, to your plans and strategies, your best thinking and your real knowledge. We will not be satisfied with the four-color brochure, with WebSites, FB profiles, and all this shit from a Zuckergußfassade, but without content.
We are also the contributors who make this country run. We want to directly talk about problems and possible solutions, in our language, and not in the platitudes of a conversation guide.
As a society and as contributors we feel bored to death of the information that we received from you only by remote control. Why do we need faceless statistics and market research from third-hand for us to meet in person?
As a society and contributors, we wonder why you do not listen to us. You seem to speak a different language.
The inflated self-centered jargon with which you throw around you - in the press and on your party days - what does that have to do with us?
Maybe you impressed by your friends lobby. Maybe you impressed the others of your kind Us unimpressed her.
If you are not impressed, and your voices are swim. You do not understand? If you could understand it, then it would not let you talk that way.
Your outdated notions of "society" have clouded your vision. We recognize ourselves in your designs to reality again not - perhaps because we know that we're already elsewhere.
7The new world we like it much better. In fact, we create it ourselves namely himself.
You're invited, but it's our world. Pulls your shoes off at the door. If you want to trade with us, then steps down from your high horse.
Against your advertising we are immune. So forget it.
If you wish that we talk with you, then tell us what. For a change, something interesting.
We have some ideas that should interest you: new tools we need to find better ways. Property for which we would like to use to return to the ideals of democracy back. Have you ever a minute?
you are too busy with the "Politkmachen" to answer our email? Oh my goodness, that I'm sorry, really, we'll come back later. Maybe.
You want that we choose you? Then you should give us better your attention.
Come down from your trip. Stop it with your neurotic Selbstumkreisung. Take part in the party.
Do not worry, you can still make money. That is, as long as this is not the only thing you busy and you should represent.
Have you ever noticed that money in itself is somehow one-dimensional and boring? What we could talk to?
Your Politk has not worked out. Why? We would like to ask the people who made it. Your government strategy makes no sense to us. We would like to chat with our so-called representatives of the people. What do you want to say that just are not there?
We desire to have 80 million of us just take it seriously as a reporter or a camera facing you, but it is so much posturing.
We know some people from your store. Which are pretty decent when we meet on the Internet. Hides her away even more? Could not they come out and play with us?
If we have questions, we turn to other people on the Internet. Would you have "your people" not in its control, then they might have among the people to whom we should turn our attention.
When we were not your "target audience", many of us are employees of a more democratic world. We would prefer to talk with friends on the net, as to the work to promote the future of the country need. Work together for a democracy 2.0 would make you faster than even the famous chic Image site. But it tells us that not talking to the company's your thing.
We would hope that you will notice what is happening here. That would be really nice to look at you what you screwed up. But it would be a mistake to assume that we are sitting here and waited.
We have better things to do than us worrying about whether her your ways in time come to grips to come and talk to us. You are a part of our lives influences currently negative and we will not tolerate this any longer. Think about it: who needs whom? Your only job is to represent us. If ye do not, then we have to represent ourselves on the internet and you become the manager or even superfluous.
We have real power - and we know it. If you do not realize the light at the end of the tunnel can, then we will move forward now. Pathways is represented in which the interest of the people. Democracy, you know ...
Even in the worst case, our newfound conversation is more interesting than any of your trade shows, more entertaining than a comedy on television and lifelike by far than any of your party web sites, which we have previously crossed paths.
Our oath is our own citizens - our families, our friends, our new allies, even our sparring partners. Parties that do not participate in this world will have no future.
You give a lot of money on surveys. Why do könn't then this time bomb not hear ticking? This is even more.
We exist both within the parties, as well as outside of them. The boundaries that separate our conversations seem to us like the Berlin Wall. In reality, they are mere annoyances. We know that they fallen.Tatsächlich we work from both sides of the walls of the fact that they fall.
The traditional parties like the networked conversations appear confused and confusing. But we are organizing faster than they do. We have better tools, more new ideas, no rules to stop us.
We are waking up and linking to each other. We watch. But we will not wait.
We are ANONYMOUS!
We do not forget!
We do not forgive!