a16z Podcast: Banking on the Blockchain by a16z published on 2016-05-10T05:56:36Z Whether you think of it as a distributed ledger, decentralized database, computing infrastructure, open source/ software development platform, cryptocurrency, transaction platform, or financial services marketplace, the bitcoin blockchain is driven by two key features: that it is a peer-to-peer network, and that it unbundles trust. Imagine moving from Googling for things to offering proof-as-a-service instead (which itself begins with rethinking identity). In fact, there's a lot of parallels -- both in evolution and development -- with the blockchain and the internet before it. Only the blockchain doesn't need the web. And that has profound implications for what applications and new businesses are now possible, especially in financial services. But if "the worst place to develop a new business model is from within your existing business model", then how can banks move beyond mere process innovations to offering entirely new services built on the blockchain? Many financial institutions are trying to get ahead of the blockchain disruption by exploring it proactively, but how do they overcome the innovator's dilemma and looking at startups like animals in a zoo? In this episode of the a16z Podcast, William Mougayar, the author of the new book The Business Blockchain: Promise, Practice, and Application of the Next Internet Technology shares how traditional, established industries can overcome the innovator's dilemma in this case; what the future of banks might be; and what new applications, services, and startups are possible due to the features -- really, benefits -- of the blockchain. Because the blockchain, ultimately, is an innovation platform. Genre Business Comment by Unconfirmed Transactions @vladislav-dramaliev: The currency bitcoin, with a little 'b', does not have this issue. Nakamoto Consensus or Proof-of-work ensures this. Adding data to the OP_RETURN or encoding it in multisig txs is necessarily outside of that consensus mechanism and requires a new mechanism on top. This is often glossed over or misunderstood. Hence, the comment. If you think a blockchain is going to bring transparency to banks, I have news for you, banks will do all their dirty off-chain and "cook the blockchain". Provenance apps require so much trust, you could just use a database. Also, identity on the blockchain is dumb. Pseudonymous access control is probably the best we can do for a long time. 2016/05/12 15:24:20 +0000 Comment by Vladislav Dramaliev @unconfirmed-transactions: The one who entered it also should follow strict rules. In the case of bitcoin - he must have bitcoins, in order to send them and thus, initiate a ledger change. For other types of information - maybe. 2016/05/12 08:12:49 +0000 Comment by Unconfirmed Transactions @vladislav-dramaliev: There's not much to argue. That something is stored in a blockchain does not necessarily make it true. You have to trust who entered it. 2016/05/11 16:47:01 +0000 Comment by Vladislav Dramaliev @unconfirmed-transactions: Arguments? 2016/05/11 13:59:16 +0000 Comment by flockonus Of course it can be stopped, in fact it's what happen by default, unless there is $ incentive 2016/05/11 02:46:00 +0000 Comment by Unconfirmed Transactions Garbage in, Garbage out. 2016/05/10 17:30:12 +0000