Valley Public Radio: Who's eligible? State, advocates are at odds over ADHC's disabled, elderly

Lauren Whaley Radio on August 28, 2012 22:36

Play
0.00 / 4.01
Hide the comments

Stats for this track

This Week Total
Plays 95
Comments 1
Downloads 11
Report copyright infringement

More tracks by Lauren Whaley Radio

Preventing subsequent suicide attempts one phone call at a time

Trop Mag Postcard: This Week

Valley Public Radio: Obesity education, one woman's lessons

Southern California Public Radio (KPCC): Community clinics on the rise in California

KQED Public Radio: Reduced Infection Rates at Riverside Medical Center

View all

They're poor. They're elderly. They're disabled. But are they eligible? Advocates and state officials are struggling to determine just who among hundreds will be allowed to continue in the program that replaces Medi-Cal's Adult Day Health Care (ADHC) system. Cash-starved California slashed the optional ADHC benefit last fall and replaced it with a leaner program called Community-Based Adult Services (CBAS).

The state-wide centers continue to serve about 80 percent of the original 40,000 or so participants, some of California’s frailest individuals, people who suffer from multiple disabilities including Alzheimer's, paralysis and traumatic brain injury. Advocates say the evaluation process for new participants was flawed and left many needy people without care. The state contends that the process worked and that only the most medically fragile individuals qualified, as intended.

1 Comment

0 timed comments and 1 regular comment

  • Grizzley-1
    Grizzley-1 on September 07, 2012 21:04

    The State, particularly in the San Francisco area, is excluding people from eligibility based on incomplete profiles provided by unqualified reviewers. For example, the RN who reviewed a number of cases in our area had two years' operating room experience and several years working as a bureaucrat. She described one of the partciipants she interviewed as "alert and oriented," the fact that, with some of his social skills intact, he has advanced Alzheimer's disease. Nice lady, but has never worked with patients who were awake when she dealt with them. I blame the Department for sending her into a situation for which she was not qualified. Another problem is overrulling of decisions that participants are eligible by bureaucrats who have never seen them and who have reviewed only a limited summary document. The review sysem is broken, and the State is not meeting its agreed-upon deadlines for eligibility hearings, which greatly compounds the problem.

Add a new comment

You need to be logged in to post a comment. If you're already a member, please or sign up for a free account.

Share to WordPress.com

If you are using self-hosted WordPress, please use our standard embed code or install the plugin to use shortcodes.
Add a comment 0 comments at 0.00
    Click to enter a
    comment at
    0.00