Stats for this track
| This Week | Total | |
|---|---|---|
| Plays | – | 538 |
| Comments | – | 18 |
| Favoritings | – | 16 |
| Downloads | – | 28 |
Uploaded by
In 2 Sets
2012 all n4tural Junto tracks
38 Tracks, 1.37.34
In 3 Groups
- User Image
Group
moderated
Pärtness because we like Arvo
- User Image
Group
moderated
SuperCollider Music made with the SuperCollider Programming Language
- User Image
Group
Disquiet Junto Association for communal music/sound-making. (Please read the Info tab before posting. All Disquiet Junto tracks are based on specific projects.)
inspired, via several detours, and filtered through my boundless ineptitude, by Christian Carrière ( Interceiving )'s very cool http://vimeo.com/30074885
;
for Disquiet Junto #7 "subtract":
Plan: The seventh Junto project is a shared-sample project. Everyone will work from the same source audio, which is provided below. You will take the provided sound sample and from it make an original work. You will do this only by subtracting sound from the sample. You won't add anything to it. You won't slow it down. You won't speed it up. You won't cut it up, and you won't otherwise reorganize its contents. You won't play it backwards. You will only "remove." The word "remove" is up for interpretation -- but generally speaking, I'd say that it means various acts of lowering the volume of a narrow or wide band of the audio spectrum for either a short or long period of time. And, of course, "lowering the volume" can mean be interpreted to mean "muting." The act here of "removing" is the sonic equivalent of sculpting something from a marble block.
Please use the WAV file at the following URL:
http://www.freesound.org/people/Luftrum/sounds/48412
;
i may get an F for this one, though i believe i've followed the spirit, if not the letter.
What you hear is really 24 copies of the source, each run through a hard bandpass filter that accentuates a different frequency. So each copy is subtracting almost everything from the close-to white noise of the original recording, but i guess it's debatable whether the sum of it all still qualifies as "subtracting". It's most def "sculpting", though :)
Here's the gist of the http://SuperCollider.sf.net code:
~paertness={
[[72,69,64], [70,64,62], [67,60,70], [65,60,69], [64,60,67],[65,60,69]].do{|triplet|
triplet.postln;
triplet.do{|midi|
var x = midi.midicps.postln;
var b = [40,45,52].midicps.choose;
15.do{|i| 1.do{~filtChPlays.choose.synth.set('filter', (exprand(x-(x/64),x+(x/64))).postln)};
~filtChPlays.choose.synth.set('filter', (exprand(b-(b/64),b+(b/64))).postln);
0.4.wait;};
};
};
}.fork;
companion piece: sistres by tengototen;
__________________________________________________________________________
pic: http://www.flickr.com/photos/elinterno/4980615978/in/photostream/
- Carlos Lemosh
Carlos Lemosh at 0.42 on April 09, 2012 16:59
This track remind me the time I used to be a swimmer, it feels good!
- professology
- Erik Natanael Gustafsson
- DJ Kaboodle
DJ Kaboodle at 1.08 on February 23, 2012 17:54
There's a great musicality at work throughout this. I think it still qualifies as 'subtraction', too!
- Valiska
- S0N0
- Emma Hendrix
- Sun Hammer
- :¬l
:¬l at 0.23 on February 20, 2012 00:49
A good result from your process. I believe it does meet the project's criteria because nothing has been added. Nothing, that is, except a sense of melodic structure that was until now hidden within that sound.
- name subject to change
- swampmessiah
swampmessiah at 1.44 on February 19, 2012 21:21
This reminds you of Arvo Part, the wind-like sounds? It does bring to mind some of the quieter passages of his choral works, though it reminds me more of some things I've heard by Ingram Marshall. Interesting piece.
- zenjungle
- alisonboston-1
alisonboston-1 at 1.54 on February 19, 2012 17:05
well, i won't give you an F for listenability - course am a sucker for water sounds :) added or subtracted :)
- all n4tural
all n4tural at 0.00 on February 19, 2012 16:22
@Yasuo Akai: i think you will get an F, too :)
companion piece, additive instead of subtractive:
- Yasuo Akai
Yasuo Akai at 0.00 on February 19, 2012 16:00
@all n4tural: basically that's the same of how i did. FFT filter can do what you explain here without copying...
- -Øystein Jørgensen (Q)
- IMPCOLLECTIVE
- all n4tural
all n4tural at 0.00 on February 19, 2012 15:12
for Disquiet Junto #7 "subtract":
i may get an F for this one, though i believe i've followed the spirit, if not the letter.
What you hear is really 24 copies of the source, each run through a hard bandpass filter that accentuates a different frequency. So each copy is subtracting almost everything from the close-to white noise of the original recording, but i guess it's debatable whether the sum of it all still qualifies as "subtracting". It's most def "sculpting", though :)
18 Comments
17 timed comments and 1 regular comment